How teams are using theORQL

From fast-moving startups to established enterprises, teams use theORQL to streamline operations, increase visibility, and accelerate growth. Explore how our platform delivers real-world impact.

Delta Growth case study

Client: Delta Growth
Industry: Sustainability Consulting / Carbon Accounting / ESG Compliance
Use case: Faster debugging and validation of emissions calculation workflows across vehicle and reporting modules

Background & Context

Delta Growth supports businesses, communities, and public organisations in measuring carbon emissions, meeting ESG goals, and producing transparent sustainability reporting aligned with frameworks like ISO 14064.

The Problem (Before theORQL)

As emissions calculation logic became more complex, debugging inconsistencies across modules required significant manual effort. Small errors in vehicle input data or formulas could create incorrect emissions outputs, and tracing the source across multiple UI components was time-consuming.

Key Metrics

Time to result: within the first week of integration
Main problem solved: faster debugging and validation of emissions calculation workflows
Outcome achieved: accurate carbon footprint outputs across vehicle and emissions modules
Time saved: 30% reduction in troubleshooting and QA time

Main Goal

Develop and validate an internal emissions calculation system that accurately supports carbon footprint assessments, particularly for vehicle-related emissions and reporting dashboards.

Previous Solutions Tried

Traditional debugging tools, manual logging, and repeated QA cycles. The team needed faster validation without slowing development.

How theORQL was used

Vehicle Emissions UI
Emissions Reporting UI
Carbon footprint estimation workflows
Workflow debugging, rapid validation of emissions outputs, and mismatch detection between UI modules

Workflow (before)

// Before theORQL
// - Traditional debugging tools
// - Manual logging
// - Repeated QA cycles
// - Slow traceability across UI modules

Workflow (with theORQL)

// With theORQL
// - Dedicated debugging + validation layer
// - Rapid validation of emissions outputs
// - Faster mismatch detection across modules
// - More reliable release checks

Results & Impact

Debugging became faster and more reliable, allowing the team to confidently deliver accurate emissions calculations aligned with Delta Growth’s transparency-first approach. theORQL also strengthened internal validation workflows, improving long-term maintainability.

How theORQL helped

theORQL helped Delta Growth:

Validate calculations across vehicle and reporting workflows faster
Trace mismatches across UI modules with less manual effort
Improve reliability for compliance-critical emissions outputs

Business Outcome

The key business impact was:

Higher confidence in output accuracy and transparency
Faster development with less debugging overhead
Stronger validation processes for future emissions workflows

"The Orql significantly improved the way we debug and validate. It helped us trace issues across UI and reporting workflows much faster, ensuring the accuracy and transparency that sustainability compliance work demands."

Featured case study

Client: Michael Tomlin, Dev Lead at PixelPerfect
Industry: SaaS / React web app
Use case: Debugging a state not updating UI bug caused by a swallowed render exception

The challenge

A developer shipped an AI-generated React settings page where a controlled input looked clickable and setState was being called, but the UI never reflected changes. There were no useful console errors, so they spent 30+ minutes second-guessing React state behavior.

What was actually happening

The re-render path threw a render-time exception (toLowerCase() on a sometimes undefined path). A defensive try/catch returned null, swallowing the error and hiding the failing subtree.

Minimal pattern (before)

function EmailField({ user }) {
  const [email, setEmail] = useState(user.email ?? "");

try {
    const domain = user.account.profile.emailDomain.toLowerCase(); // sometimes undefined
    return (
      <label>
        Email
        <input value={email} onChange={(e) => setEmail(e.target.value)} />
        <span className="hint">Must be a {domain} address</span>
      </label>
    );
  } catch {
    return null; // hides the real issue
  }
}

After

function EmailField({ user }) {
  const [email, setEmail] = useState(user.email ?? "");
  const domain =
    user?.account?.profile?.emailDomain?.toLowerCase() ?? "valid";

return (
    <label>
      Email
      <input value={email} onChange={(e) => setEmail(e.target.value)} />
      <span className="hint">Must be a {domain} address</span>
    </label>
  );
}

theORQL Results

With theORQL, the same investigation collapsed to about 3 minutes: click broken UI with Element Trace, jump to owning component, see the real exception context, apply a reviewable diff, and rerun to validate.

How theORQL helped

From the same runtime context, they:

Used Element Trace to click the broken input and jump straight to the owning component
Immediately surfaced the render exception and the silent fallback path
Applied a minimal diff in VS Code and reran the scenario to validate

The key win

The win was:

Click broken UI and get the owning code path plus runtime evidence
See the true failure mode, not a noisy symptom
Apply a reviewable diff and validate before shipping

What developers say about theORQL

"theORQL significantly improved the way we debug and validate. It helped us trace issues across UI and reporting workflows much faster, ensuring the accuracy and transparency that sustainability compliance work demands."

"theORQL fixed a frustrating silent bug where user input never updated state – no errors, no logs. Selected the element, explained the problem and got a precise fix. Fixed in minutes instead of hours."

Eleftheria Batsou

UX Researcher & Developer Advocate

"As a coding tutor, one of the hardest things is helping students understand why something breaks, not just how to make the error disappear. Instead of guessing or randomly changing code, theORQL makes that visible."

Antonia Symeon

Coding Tutor, Dev Team Lead

"Fixing broken elements usually takes me about twenty minutes, but theORQL cuts that down to two."

Ajay Y

Frontend Developer, Freelance

"theORQL simplifies debugging and helps me catch issues way faster. The workflow improvements alone make it worth 5 stars. Can’t wait to see future updates!"

Victoria Guiñazú

VSCode Review

"Great Chrome - VS Code workflow that genuinely reduces context switching. Setup is smooth, and the idea of runtime-aware fixes without living in DevTools is powerful."

Norbert Patrick

VSCode Review

Here are some of the use cases we've successfully addressed: optimizing workflow efficiency, enhancing customer

Centralized analytics for leadership teams
Workflow automation across sales, ops, and product
Improved onboarding and client management
Marketing attribution and ROI reporting
Secure and compliant data access

Stop Coding Blind. Try it in 2 Minutes on your App

theORQL sees all: auto-repro UI/Code failures and auto-fixes so UI changes actually stick.

Testimonials

What developers say about theORQL

Eleftheria Batsou

Ajay Y


### User Statistics
- **Active Users:** 10,000  
- **Satisfaction Rate:** 95%  
- **Average Time Saved:** 2 hours per week

### Concluding Remarks
Using theORQL has transformed debugging processes, ensuring developers spend less time on issues and more on building features. The efficiency gains it offers can lead to significant productivity improvements across teams.